(Photo: Reuters / Pascal Rossignol) Truthful. A new measure of the Socialist candidate was again cringe. This time of the UNEF. The student union, notorious for his refusal of the CPE, is mounted to the plate against the response of Segolene Royal in youth unemployment. A contract first chance, far from persuading the National Union of Students of France (UNEF). The solution Royal dixit president of the UNEF, Bruno Julliard, launches the idea " there may be a CPE on the left. This response is not appropriate to a real issue, that of employment for unskilled youth. "Coincidence or irony of fate, the draft retains a controversial symbol as close CPE. In this connection, the student union leader admits " surprised a strategic perspective, [that Ms. Royal] to resume such a formulation one year after the CPE. "While it is true that the measure is more than necessary, Segolene Royal could afford to surprise everyone, even if the veil of novelty masks the intricacies of the project. " I hope we have details in the coming days to raise some concerns " concedes, worried, Bruno Julliard.
Through this concern, the UNEF is again enhance the deep demagoguery of its action. The refusal of a " contract for young " in favor of a " contract law, a Commission, to which young people make a very short trial period " remains an aberration . Why would a young graduate with no work experience, should qualify for the job security? In parallel, the harsh reality of the market requires a company quickly and efficiently. What happens when a young graduate - an effective short trial period and many least once a contract in hand - threatens the balance of the company? Segolene Royal moreover, because when it considers " everyone is fraudulent. "Notice similar to that of Dominique de Villepin with his First Employment Contract. The CPE was it a bad law?
Through this concern, the UNEF is again enhance the deep demagoguery of its action. The refusal of a " contract for young " in favor of a " contract law, a Commission, to which young people make a very short trial period " remains an aberration . Why would a young graduate with no work experience, should qualify for the job security? In parallel, the harsh reality of the market requires a company quickly and efficiently. What happens when a young graduate - an effective short trial period and many least once a contract in hand - threatens the balance of the company? Segolene Royal moreover, because when it considers " everyone is fraudulent. "Notice similar to that of Dominique de Villepin with his First Employment Contract. The CPE was it a bad law?
(citations: lemonde.fr)
0 comments:
Post a Comment